TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Table of Contents
|
i
|
|
Introduction
|
1
|
|
History of Previous Regional
Planning Efforts
|
3
|
|
Authorized Regional Water
Planning Administrative Entity
|
3
|
|
Planning Status
|
3
|
|
Water Resource Problems
in the SJHU
|
4
|
|
Goals and Objectives
|
5
|
|
Plan to Plan
|
5
|
|
Scope of Work (2000-2001) |
5
|
|
Watersheds
|
9
|
|
TASK 1 - Water Supply Assessment
|
10
|
|
Subtask 1.1 - Water Supply
Data Collection
|
10
|
|
Subtask 1.2 - Analysis
of the water supply data
|
11
|
|
Subtask 1.3 - Preparation
of the water supply assessmnent report
|
11
|
|
SUBTASK
1.3.1 : Deliverables
|
12
|
|
TASK 2 - Water Demand Assessment
|
12
|
|
Subtask 2.1 - Estimate
Existing Demands
|
12
|
|
Subtask 2.2 - Economic
Modeling and Population Projections
|
13
|
|
Subtask 2.3 : Deliverables
|
13
|
|
TASK 3 - Water Budget
|
13
|
|
Subtask 3.1 : Deliverable
|
14
|
|
TASK 4 - Public Involvement
|
15
|
|
Subtask 4.1 Public Involvement
|
15
|
|
Subtask
4.1.1 List of stakeholders and participants
|
15
|
|
Subtask
4.1.2 Public Notification and Comments
|
16
|
|
Subtask
4.1.3 Use of media
|
16
|
|
Subtask
4.1.4 Press releases
|
16
|
|
Subtask
4.1.5 Involvement of local governments
|
17
|
|
Subtask
4.1.6 Outreach efforts tailored to meet specific communities
|
17
|
|
Subtask
4.1.7 Other Indian Stakeholders
|
17
|
|
Subtask
4.1.8 Agricultural Stakeholders
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.1.9 Navajo Indian Irrigation Project
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.1.10 New Mexico State University and County Extension Service
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.1.11 Other Agricultural Stakeholders
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.1.12 Industrial Users
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.1.13 Environmental
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.1.14 Other identified stakeholders
|
18
|
|
Subtask 4.2 - Develop
Alternatives to Meet Needs
|
18
|
|
Subtask
4.2.1 Evaluation of Aquifer Development Potential
|
19
|
|
Subtask
4.2.2 Other Alternatives Development Tasks
|
19
|
|
Subtask
4.2.3 Deliverables:
|
20
|
|
TASK 5 - Prepare Regional Water Plan Draft and Final
Reports
|
20
|
|
Subtask
5.1.1 Deliverable:
|
21
|
|
TASK 6 - Quality Control and Assurance
|
21
|
|
TASK 7 - Administration
|
21
|
|
Summary Description of the Planning Process
|
22
|
|
Implementation of the Regional Water Plan
|
24
|
|
Key Personnel
|
24
|
|
San Juan Water Commission
Staff:
|
24
|
|
Navajo Nation Representatives:
|
24
|
|
Contractors: |
24
|
|
Assistance from ISC Staff
|
25
|
|
Political framework among multiple jurisdictions in
th Region
|
25
|
|
Budget
|
25
|
|
Summary Statement
|
26
|
|
Attachment 1 - Draft Organization Documents
|
|
|
Attachment 2 - Supporting Data for Schedule and Costs |
INTRODUCTION
This scope of work is submitted to the New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission
for developing a region water plan for the San Juan Hydrologic Unit. This regional
plan will incorporate portions of the 40-Year Regional Water Plan, (Dated
March 1994), New Mexico State Planning and Development District 1, prepared
for the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments. The plan will conform to
the State of New Mexico Regional Water Planning Template.
This project scope is limited to the portions of San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba
and Sandoval counties, which lie in the San Juan River watershed, hereinafter
referred to as the San Juan Hydrologic Unit (SJHU). The SJHU within New Mexico
has an area of approximately 10,000 square miles and it is identified on Figure
1.
This scope does not include updating of any portions of the March 1994 40-Year
Regional Water Plan covering areas outside of the SJHU.
Figure 1: San Juan Hydrologic Unit within New Mexico

History of Previous Regional Planning Efforts
In 1981, San Juan County prepared a Water Supply Master Plan for San Juan
County. Funding for the preparation was provided by the Four Corners Regional
Commission, New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission, and San Juan County. Professional
services were provided by Black and Veach at a cost of approximately $200,000.
In 1989, San Juan Water Commission contracted with Black and Veach Engineers-Architect
to prepare a 40-year Regional Water Supply Plan. Funding for the preparation
was provided by the Interstate Streams Commission and the San Juan Water Commission
and totaled approximately $32,000.
In 1994, the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments (NWNMCOG) prepared
a 40-Year Regional Water Plan for San Juan, McKinley, and Cibola counties.
Cibola County and portions of McKinley County are not hydrologically connected
to the SJHU; however, the three-county area was grouped together for political
purposes.
In 1996, the Navajo Nation and the San Juan Water Commission jointly undertook
a public participation effort to develop a planning committee to develop a San
Juan Basin Regional Water Plan. This was a grassroots effort to involve the
broadest stakeholder representation. This effort was funded by the Navajo Nation,
the San Juan Water Commission and a $25,000 planning grant through the Interstate
Stream Commission. Draft organizational documents were developed and are provided
in Attachment 1 of this scope of work.
Using remaining funds and a 1997 ISC grant ($30,000), the San Juan Water Commission
and the Navajo Nation initiated data collection and development and continued
the process of organizing the planning committee through public participation
meetings.
Authorized Regional Water Planning Administrative Entity
The San Juan Water Commission (SJWC) is a regionally organized Joint Powers
entity. Member entities include the cities of Aztec, Bloomfield, and Farmington
and nine rural water user associations. San Juan County is also a member entity
and serves as the SJWC's fiscal agent.
The SJWC is committed to the process and will remain an active participant.
The SJWC is prepared to administer this regional planning effort.
PLANNING STATUS
The San Juan River watershed is a distinct hydrologic unit within the State
and is identified by the State Engineer's Office and the United States Geologic
Survey (USGS) as such. Its surface water makes up 12% of the State of New Mexico's
total water withdrawals. Waters from the area flow naturally into the Upper
Colorado Basin. The San Juan Basin further supplies water to Albuquerque and
other communities in the Rio Grande Basin through the San Juan-Chama trans-basin
diversion.
Much of the San Juan Hydrologic Unit is located within the Navajo Nation. The
SJWC met with the Navajo Nation and agreed to develop a Regional Water Plan
for the entire SJHU. The execution and administration of the resulting contractual
agreement (C60435) was workable for both parties and will be amended to reflect
the phases of work that still needs to be accomplished under this scope of work.
Work associated with water resources within the Navajo Nation will be directed
by the Navajo Nation, Department of Water Resources Management and will be integrated
into the basin-wide report.
Two-thirds of the Jicarilla Apache Nation's reservation lies within the SJHU.
The Nation has recently indicated that they are performing significant hydrologic
data gathering and geohydrologic studies within and around their reservation.
These data and their projected water resource needs will provide a significant
contribution to the planning effort and will be conducted by the Office of Water
Administration under the guidance of the Water Commission. The Nation's previous
involvement in planning activities were limited by staffing resource issues
and other high priority issues needing to be addressed at that time. They have
recently indicated a willingness and ability to more actively paricipate in
the regional planning process.
The 1989, 40-Year Regional Water Supply Plan (1989 Plan) continues to
be useful. The 1989 Plan did not incorporate sufficient public participation,
and therefore it lacks a resolution or an implementable plan. Nevertheless,
the SJWC and the Navajo Nation have successfully pursued recommendations from
the 1989 Plan, to the betterment of the region. This work will identify changing
conditions and provide increased data that will improve the value of information
contained in that document.
One of the lessons learned from the Northwest New Mexico Council of Governments
40 Year Regional Water Plan (hereinafter referred to as the 1994 Plan)
is the difficulty in attempting to develop a plan that includes several distinct
hydrologic units. The 1994 Plan states:
"This Plan was designed to be regional in nature ... Localized site specific
issues could not be reported on nor solved by recommendations included in this
document."
The major intent of updating specific portions of the 1994 Plan which fall within
the SJHU is to address site specific issues and provide recommendations on these
issues.
Absent in the 1994 Plan was an adequate public participation component. The
process failed to assure that the public was afforded the greatest opportunity
to participate. The 1994 Plan was not successful in incorporating adequate San
Juan County and Navajo participation. This occurred because the focus of the
1994 Plan was directed towards collecting data and preparing water supply and
demand projections and subordinated public participation to formulate alternatives
and solutions.
The 1981 Water Supply Master Plan (1981 Plan) was far ahead of its time.
The organization and format was similar to the 1989 Plan. The 1981 Plan was
competent but, the public did not participate and there were no allowances for
changes in conditions. The 1981 & 1989 documents were primarily water supply
inventories and demand projections. Given these limitations, these plans will
provide valuable data and comparisons for the proposed San Juan Basin Regional
Water Plan.
Water Resource Problems in the SJHU
The SJHU represents the classic conflicts over a finite water supply. The controversy
in the SJHU is about the competing interests of historic uses, Native American
claims and their settlement, future growth and endangered species. Balancing
these competing interests is further complicated by New Mexico's Upper Colorado
River Basin Compact apportionment and available, reliable and sustainable water
supplies of the San Juan, Animas and La Plata Rivers. As an illustration of
these complex issues, regional non-native water development began after 1878,
while Native American reservations were established in 1868 or earlier. The
reservations retain an earlier priority date than the majority of non-native
rights. However, even these early priorities may be challenged by the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), and the Native Americans may not be able to develop their
water rights, although they have early priority dates. This decade's ESA Reasonable
and Prudent Alternatives prevent New Mexico's remaining allocation of Upper
Basin Water from being used. The regional planning effort must consider this
constraint, and anticipate that these issues will be effectively resolved.
Another issue is the opposition of environmentalists and fiscal conservatives
to structural water development, i.e., diversion structures, dams, and/or reservoirs.
This opposition from environmental preservationist and the fiscal conservatives
to structural water development creates significant challenges for regional
planning. Local entities nearing the limits of their sustainable water supplies
are in need of effective strategies that include environmental protection and
sound fiscal planning.
Goals and Objectives
The goals of the San Juan Basin Regional Water Plan are to:
1. Identify existing and future water demands
2. Identify water supplies for the basin
3. Determine needs to be met by considered alternatives
4. Develop implementable alternatives to meet
water needs, including conservation measures.
The objective of the Plan is to develop a comprehensive, regional decision-planning
tool that can be used by water planners to effectively plan for projects to
meet future water needs.
There are four distinct principal activities needed to accomplish the above
goals and objective. They are:
1. Public participation and education
2. Data collection and planning assessment
3. Alternative formulation, evaluation, selection
with implementation planning and scheduling
4. Implementation of the Regional Water Plan.
The proposed Regional Water Plan will include the first three activities.
PLAN TO PLAN
The Interstate Stream Commission has limited funds for regional planning. Recognizing
this, the activities described above are phased. The SJWC planned for several
years to complete the activities required for the Regional Water Plan and some
of the preliminary work has been completed. Work funded during the first year
(1994-1995) included a strong public participation program to:
1. identify stakeholder concerns,
2. develop an organizational framework for a proposed
Planning Committee, and;
3. define the direction of the Regional Plan.
The planning process proposed for this current effort will further strengthen
the plan by inviting continued public participation and by establishing a Planning
Committee to direct the work.
The first grant funding from the ISC ($25,000) was for the organization of a
public participation program. The initial effort was completed by the Navajo
Nation and the SJWC, resulting in each sponsor drafting an "Agreement Organizing
the San Juan Basin Planning Committee for New Mexico" document.
In addition to public involvement and the efforts to form the Planning Committee
(Committee), a draft San Juan Hydrologic Unit Data Collection Study was completed
in September 1998. This effort collected available data and identified data
gaps that would need to be filled during subsequent work efforts. This information
is contained in a draft report and CD. The ISC granted funds ($30,000) for this
initial data collection work and the continuation of the public participation
program.
SCOPE OF WORK (2001-2002)
The proposed work effort is divided into activities as shown on Figure 2. The
activities have been grouped into four major tasks. These tasks with their work
hours, costs estimates and schedule are shown on the MS-Project Gant Chart (Figure
3). Additional supporting data for the project schedule is included in Attachment
2.
Watersheds
Although much of the data will be collected by individual communities and diversions,
it is proposed that water supply and demands analyses will be presented by watershed.
There are eight defined watersheds within the study area. They are:
1. Animas
2. Blanco Canyon
3. Chaco
4. Middle San Juan
5. LaPlata
6. Upper San Juan
7. San Juan above Navajo
8. Mancos
Figure 4 below illustrates the areas of each watershed.
Figure 4: Watersheds within the SJHU

Totals for municipal, industrial and agricultural demands for
each watershed will be presented in the study.
These totals will be compared against total water supplies for the watershed
to identify needs.
TASK 1 - WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
Subtask 1.1 - Water Supply Data Collection
The first task in a regional water plan is to determine the available water
supply for the region. This usually entails a significant data collection
effort. Much of the data collection effort was completed in 1998 for the draft
San Juan Hydrologic Unit Data Collection Study. Subtask 1.1 will begin with
a review of the existing data files from that study. The data collection effort
will focus on data gaps that are relevant to the water supply within the region.
This will include incorporating data provided from the Navajo Nation.
Following is a description of the data to be collected for this subtask:
A. Climatological and stream gage data in Colorado,
within the SJHU. This may be used in evaluating and correlating surface water
supplies for average and drought conditions. It may also be used for water
supply frequency evaluations.
B. Identification of the physical attributes
for each watershed including:
1. Topography,
2. Location of
irrigated lands,
3. Stream mileage,
4. Sources of
stream flow,
5. Location of
gages, location of discharge areas and springs
6. Municipal discharges
C. Data to be collected on the surface water
supply will include:
1. Gage location,
2. Period of record,
3. Maximum and
minimum monthly and annual discharges,
4. Flow duration
analysis,
5. Notation of
diversions above the gage(s),
6. Hydrographs
D. Water related facilities within the study
boundary will be identified as to type, location, capacity, owner, and service
area. If the owner does not know the capacity, an estimate of its capacity
will be made. Typical water related facilities that will be inventoried include:
1. River diversion
structures
2. Canals (major
conveyance facilities only, minor ditches excluded)
3. Water treatment
plants
4. Wells
5. Pipelines (conveyance
facilities only, pipe networks excluded)
In addition to the above facilities,
storage reservoirs, both raw water and potable water will be identified. Relevant
information for these facilities includes:
1. Location,
2. Design capacity
in acre - feet ,
3. Primary purpose,
4. Owner/operator,
5. Average storage
and surface area,
6. Net evaporation
and total losses to evaporation in acre - feet per year,
7. Average releases
E. Water quality data will be obtained for each
surface water source where available.
F. Navajo Indian Irrigation Project (NIIP) Water
Resources data and other diversion data will be collected to evaluate the
availability of water within sub-basins.
G. Reclamation operation studies used to justify
quantification of water rights.
H. Geologic data on the defined groundwater
aquifers (underground water basins) will be collected. Sources for this information
will include:
1. a masters thesis
from NM Institute of Mining and Technology on the potential groundwater capacity.
2. USBR siting
studies of reservoirs in NM associated with the Animas-La Plata Project.
3. The Oil Conservancy
(Aztec) for publicly available geologic information.
Data to be gathered from these
reports includes:
1. Geology
2. Aquifer characteristics
3. Pump test
inventories,
4. USGS Observation
well data
5. Trend analysis
of M&I well field drawdown and recovery
6. Effects of
snowmelt on streamflow and recharge
7. Return flows
from water users
8. Groundwater
quality data
I. Navajo Nation water supply data will be collected
by the nation's staff.
J. A water rights inventory was completed for
the Data Collection Report and will be included in the regional plan.
K. Jicarilla Apache Nation water supply and
use data along with other available information will be collected by its staff
and provided as a contribution to the planning effort.
Data will be obtained in hard copy form and digital form when possible so
that it may be readily incorporated into the project GIS database. All GIS
data will be documented in detail and maps will be developed to comply with
the State of New Mexico mapping specifications.
The map products will be provided in both hard copy and electronic formats
consisting of a CD ROM in ARC-INFO.
Subtask 1.2 -Analysis of the water supply data
As beneficial to the completion of this task, data not already available in
GIS format will be incorporated into the GIS database. The GIS database will
be maintained by the SJWC during the period of this study . The available
water supply will be estimated from the following sources:
1. Available water
supply studies
2. Stream flow
data
3. Updated estimates
of return flows from municipal, industrial, and agricultural uses.
4. The potential
for using groundwater will be reviewed based on available groundwater studies.
5. The current
hydrographic determination from the Upper Colorado River Commission will be
obtained and evaluated for applicability to Regional Water Plan purposes.
The available supply will be presented by watershed for comparison
to water demands.
Subtask 1.3 - Preparation of the water supply assessment
report
This subtask is the preparation of a report that updates the Data Collection
Report and assesses the water supply of the region.
Subtask 1.3.1 : Deliverables
-Draft Water Supply Assessment Report including legal analysis of constraints
to the water supply.
-GIS data and metadata , including maps, will be delivered on three different
CD's:
1. CD #1, ArcInfo
coverages, ArcView shape files, FGDC Metadata, miscellaneous database files
and a README CD index file
2. CD#2, ArcInfo
export files*.e00, ArcInfo graphic files, FGDC Metadata, and a README CD index
file
3. CD#3, Imagery
files with headers as necessary, FGDC Metadata, and a README CD index file
TASK 2 - WATER DEMAND ASSESSMENT
Subtask 2.1 - Estimate Existing Demands
Existing water demand information will be collected from agencies, cities,
rural water associations and the State of New Mexico. Some of this information
is available from previous study completed by the SJWC and the State of New
Mexico. Demands information will include:
A. Zoning maps, and comprehensive plans for
the communities in the study area will be collected. This information will
provide the basis for determining buildout areas and population densities
of the communities. Available master plans for communities or counties will
also be obtained.
B. Parcel data from county governments in GIS
format. This information will be useful in siting facilities associated with
proposed alternatives.
C. Population projections
-Current UNM -
Bureau of Business and Economic Research (BBER) population projections;
-2000 Census data;
-City projections;
-County projections
D. Navajo Nation water demand data will be collected by the nation's staff.
This will include population information, land uses, densities, and current
and future demands.
E. Jicarilla Apache Nation water demand data
including current and projected uses, will be provided by its staff.
F. Additional multi-spectral imagery. Imagery
along the Animas and San Juan Rivers was obtained previously by SJWC. Imagery
for the remaining areas of the SJHU will be obtained to complete the database
for the area. This information is useful in determining and quantifying riparian
areas, wetlands, and irrigated areas.
G. Recent State of New Mexico studies to identify
irrigated acreage and consumptive uses will be obtained.
H. Agricultural demands. GIS data on irrigated
acreage within the basin, including crop mix will be collected. In addition,
the State of New Mexico is currently developing demands based on recent aerial
photography. This information will be used as appropriate. The ISC will make
a determination on whether to use modified or orginal Blaney-Criddle before
this work starts.
I. Municipal demands - SJWC completed a return
flow plan and credit program for its member entities. This data will be updated
to include the most recent demand data available. This information will be
used to estimate the segregation of indoor and outdoor uses for other communities
in the basin.
J. Industrial demands based on information collected
from industrial water users.
As part of this task, the aggregate demands within watersheds will be determined
and summarized.
Subtask 2.2 - Economic Modeling and Population Projections
The relationship between the growth of employment and population is very important.
More than correlative, most people move into and out of regions because of
the availability of employment - or the lack thereof. Thus, the ability of
the region to manage its water supply and to provide water to employers is
key to the ability of the region to survive and grow.
A transparent employment water demand projection model for the San Juan Hydrologic
Unit in 10-year increments through the year 2060 will be created. Transparency
is defined as listing all assumptions to the model and providing simple methods
for refining the model as those assumptions change.
Available population projections will be evaluated in preparing the projections
for the model. Utilization of projections different from BBER will require
justification. Projections of growth in industrial and agricultural areas
were not made by previous studies. The proposed model will be used to develop
these projections for the water plan. In addition, the geographical areas
of anticipated future growth will be identified in Task 1 and used to evaluate
build out population projections.
Projected conditions will be determined by analyzing existing conditions and
trends. Those areas of most significant impact on the future water requirements
for the study area are expected to be:
1. Conversion
of lands from agricultural use to urban development
2. Development
of new agricultural lands
3. Conversion
of lands from flood irrigation to higher efficiency irrigation practices
4. Conversion
of lands within city boundaries from irrigation by ditch to irrigation by
the potable water sources
5. Development
of secondary water systems (raw water municipal supplies)
6. Protection
and maintenance of the existing riparian habitat and wetlands
7. Potential economic
development
The long-term population trends will be based on the 1960 through
2000 census. In addition, the economic model will provide high-medium-low
projections, a "cohort component", and bracketing and constraining
of population projections. The medium projection will be used for the water
use projections.
Subtask 2.3 : Deliverables
-Draft Water Demand
Assessment Report to be incorporated into the TASK 3 deliverable.
TASK 3 - WATER BUDGET
Using the information developed in Tasks 1 and 2, a regional water budget
will be developed. The projected water needs will be determine for a:
1. 40-year planning
horizon - indoor municipal uses, agricultural,industrial, fish and wildlife,
and Native American reserved rights.
2. 40-year planning
horizon - outdoor municipal uses, municipal parks, golf courses
3. Build-out planning
horizon - Municipal (indoor and outdoor), agricultural and industrial for
those communities for which growth will be geographically limited by geologic
or political boundaries. Farmington's political boundaries are defined by
adjacent communities.
An assessment of the reliability, quality, and quantity of available water
supplies for the watersheds will be made. GIS techniques will be used when
possible to correlate, link, and aggregate the various water use factors.
These factors may include projected population, land area, available supply
and type and level of use to determine the future water need projections for
each watershed.
Using this information, demands and supplies will be plotted for each watershed.
Subtask 3.1 : Deliverable
-Draft Water Budget
-GIS database and metadata for data used in the preparation of the Water Budget
TASK 4 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Subtask 4.1 Public Involvement
The public involvement component of this scope of work includes the following:
1. The Planning
Committee ("steering committee") will be created from interested
agencies, water users, city representatives, tribal representatives, and other
interested individuals.
2. Development
of a strategy for public involvement. The Planning Committee and staff will
develop a strategy for involving stakeholders and the public.
3. A list of stakeholders
will be developed and expanded as needed. This list will be used as a tool
for notifying specific individuals and agencies that have a direct stakeholding
in the results of the regional water plan.
4. A public involvement
database will be developed that will contain the list of stakeholders, public
notices, presentation materials and comments received during the public involvement
process and during the public comment period for the reports.
5. A Technical
Committee will be created from local water experts. This committee will direct
the efforts of the consultant and provide guidance, direction and criteria
for selection of alternatives and determination of reliable supplies.
6. A supply criteria
will be developed with the assistance of the Technical Committee and the consultant.
This criteria will identify acceptable levels of frequency of surface water
supplies that will be used to determine shortages and needs for storage.
7. Development
of alternatives.
8. Public Meetings.
It is proposed that three public meetings will be held. The first public meeting
will be to present findings of the demands and supply portion of the study.
The identified needs will also be presented. In addition, public suggestions
on alternatives to be considered will be received. The second public meeting
will present information on potential alternatives to meet the needs. It will
also present the recommendations of the Technical and Planning Committees
for preferred alternatives. A third meeting will conclude the study and finalize
its findings. Both the Navajo Nation and Jicarilla Apache Nation will also
conduct their own public involvement program that they will develop.
Two advisory committees will be created. The Technical Committee will provide
technical guidance to the consultants and staff. The Planning Committee will
provide overall guidance to the study, including public involvement activities
and identification of political, social, environmental and economic issues
that need to be addressed. The strategy for public involvement will be developed
as the first subtask of the public involvement task. This strategy will be
developed under the direction of the Planning Committee.
Subtask 4.1.1 List of stakeholders and participants
A listing of stakeholders and participants has been developed. This list will
be further evaluated by the advisory committees. Identified stakeholders who
have participated in organizational meetings include:
-San Juan Water Commission
- New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission
-US Fish & Wildlife
-Environmental interests
-Irrigation interests
-Bureau of Reclamation
-Utilities (Gas and Electric)
-NM Parks and Recreation
-Mineral Extraction
-Rural Users
-Industry
-Public interest
-McKinley County
-Cooperative Extension Service
-Albuquerque
-NM Game & Fish
-Farmington
-Navajo Water Resources
-Bloomfield
-Aztec
-Shiprock Chapter and other Chapters
-Domestic Water Suppliers
Identified groups invited and contacted but not present at previous meetings:
-Rio Arriba County
-Trout fishery interests
-San Juan County
-Recreational interests
-NW Council of Governments
-Jicarilla Apache Nation
-NM Environment Department
-Animas River Agricultural Water Users Association
-New Mexico Office of the State Engineer
-Sandoval County
-Additional Navajo Chapters
Subtask 4.1.2 Through previous public meetings, interested
stakeholders have been identified as possible representatives on the Regional
Water Planning Committee. In early November 1998 a public meeting was held
to review and accept the "Agreement to Organize the San Juan Basin Planning
Committee for New Mexico" as the starting point for establishing the
Committee. At this meeting names of individuals (groups) and the interests
they represent were accepted for consideration. Public Notification and Comments
Public notification of the public meetings will be made by notice in the newspaper.
In addition, stakeholders will be notified of meetings by mailings. Public
comments will be received and included in a database for use in completing
responses and incorporating those comments. Responses to comments will be
initially developed by the consultant, and then reviewed and approved by the
Planning and/or the Technical Committee, depending on the nature of the comment.
The public involvement strategy that will be developed as part of Task 4 may
expand or modify any of the public involvement activities presented by this
scope of work.
The establishment of the Planning Committee will provide a centralized body
where information can be received, coordinated and disbursed. The Committee
will evaluate interests and concerns that are expressed at public meetings.
When the Committee has enough information to offer alternatives to the public
for consideration, it will hold public meetings or workshops. The opinions
and concerns voiced by the public will be evaluated by the Committee and the
alternatives receiving the widest consensus of support will be further developed.
Public comments will be maintained in a database. After further examination
of the alternatives, the Committee will offer the preferred alternative(s)
with their recommendations to the public for their consideration.
Subtask 4.1.3 Use of media
Media will be used by the SJWC, the Navajo Nation and the Jicarilla Apache
Nation. Both the Navajo Nation and the Jicarilla Apache Nation will have the
responsibility for developing a strategy to maximize public involvement within
the lands and communities of both tribes. This will include local radio stations
broadcasts in Navajo, the Navajo Times newspaper, the Navajo Nation
Washington office, and a Navajo public affairs program that specifically interacts
with the media. It will also include the use of the Jicarilla radio station
in Dulce, NM, the Cheiftan, and the Nation's Public Affairs Office.
Subtask 4.1.4 Press releases
Press releases will be developed and released to local newspapers of general
circulation. Specific news releases will be made to specific newsletters that
have an interest in the plan's scope of work.
The Navajo Nation and the Jicarilla Apache Nation have responsibility for
press releases on issues which affect both tribes or their lands and resources.
Subtask 4.1.5 Involvement of local governments
The San Juan Water Commission is a regionally organized Joint Powers entity.
The SJWC member entities are the cities of Aztec, Bloomfield and Farmington,
San Juan County, and nine rural water users associations. Through the Joint
Powers Agreement, the entities provided a mechanism, by creating the San Juan
Water Commission, for the parties to acquire, finance, protect and conserve
additional water rights and water resources as though each entity were acting
on its own authority. The entity members see the SJWC's association with the
regional water planning effort as an integral part in protecting and conserving
their water resources and fully support the SJWC's participation in the planning
effort. The SJWC regularly invites all entity members to participate and consistently
reports on the planning status and progress.
The Navajo Nation is committed to participating in this study and will provide
resources, data and analyses to complete this regional plan.
Likewise, the Jicarilla Apache Nation is committed to participating and will
provide resources, data and analyses to complete this regional plan.
Other local governments have been invited to participate on the Planning Committee.
At a minimum, they will be listed as stakeholders and contacted throughout
the planning process.
Subtask 4.1.6 Outreach efforts tailored to meet specific
communities
The SJHU contains many diverse communities. All of these communities must
be involved if the Regional Water Plan is to be successful.
As mentioned previously, a significant portion of lands within the western
portion of the SJHU are within the Navajo Nation. The Navajo community of
Shiprock is a major user of surface water. Other smaller Navajo communities
within the SJHU also have water demands, including Crownpoint, Tohatchi, Two
Grey Hills, and Newcomb. The Navajo Indian Irrigation Project is the largest
user of agricultural water in the SJHU. In addition, the Navajo Nation is
planning a major rural water supply project to serve communities in the eastern
half of the Navajo Nation. Many of these communities are not located in the
SJHU.
To represent these interests, the Navajo Nation has expressed strong support
for working cooperatively with the SJWC on the development of a Regional Water
Plan that includes Navajo interests. During the first year, the Navajo Nation
hired a full-time public information office that informs community members
and leaders about water planning concepts and about specific issues related
to the SJHU.
The SJWC has worked closely with the Navajo Nation in the development of the
Regional Water Plan framework. The SJWC sent copies of the "draft"
Request For Proposal submitted October 16, 1998, for their review and
comments. SJWC also requested that they make additions to the "draft"
RFP to reflect Navajo interests, where appropriate. On September 14, 1998,
Rick Cox of Parsons Engineering Science and Randy Kirkpatrick with the SJWC
met with representatives of the Navajo Nation offering assistance in coordinating
the planning effort to reflect the interests of the Nation.
Subtask 4.1.7 Other Indian Stakeholders
The SJWC completed outreach efforts to meet with other Indian stakeholders
within the SJHU, specifically the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and the Jicarilla
Apache Nation. The Jicarilla Apache Nation has actively participated in the
general public meetings, including co-hosting a meeting in Dulce. During the
time of the previous planning activities, the Nation was utilizing its resources
primarily focusing on the requirements of the Jicarilla Apache Water Settlement
Act and the San Juan Basin Recovery Implementation Program. Subsequently,
the Nation could not actively participate in the regional planning process.
However, the Nation has recently established the Water Commission and the
Office of Water Administration that has water data and planning authorities.
They have indicated that direct participation in this planning effort is important
and are willing to dedicate staffing and other resources toward this effort.
The San Juan Water Commission works closely with the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe
on other issues and has asked the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe to participate in
the planning process.
Subtask 4.1.8 Agricultural Stakeholders
SJWC created an outreach program to involve agricultural stakeholders in the
update of the regional plan. Following are some of the agricultural interests
contacted.
Subtask 4.1.9 Navajo Indian Irrigation Project
In addition to the association between the SJWC and the Navajo Nation, the
Navajo Indian Irrigation Project (NIIP) project management was contacted for
their assistance in developing a Regional Water Plan. They have attended and
participated in the area public meetings.
Subtask 4.1.10 New Mexico State University and County
Extension Service
The SJWC contacted the County Extension Service to secure their participation
and involvement in the regional water planning effort. The involvement of
the County Extension Service is critical as it has a detailed understanding
of agricultural stakeholder interests. The Extension Service served as coordinator
for other federal agencies such as Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation,
Farmers Home Administration and the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
These and other agencies, including the Forest Service, have also participated.
Subtask 4.1.11 Other Agricultural Stakeholders
During updating of the Regional Plan, the SJWC cooperated with other agricultural
stakeholders in the SJHU. Some of the San Juan County irrigators have organized
under the San Juan Agricultural Water Users Association to participate. Dry
area interests from the outer edges of the SJHU, notably the Lindreth area,
have selected representatives to participate.
Subtask 4.1.12 Industrial Users
The SJWC contacted the major users of industrial water to determine their
interest in working with the SJWC on the development of a regional plan. This
includes both major power generation facilities. The response has been positive,
with identified representative at each meeting and a commitment to participate.
Subtask 4.1.13 Environmental
Known environmental groups within the study area were contacted through our
outreach program. There have been representatives at all meetings to date.
Subtask 4.1.14 Other identified stakeholders
Other stakeholders not specifically mentioned continue to be identified at
public involvement meetings. The SJHU includes areas within Rio Arriba, McKinley,
and Sandoval counties. The SJWC cooperates with all stakeholders to insure
the broadest possible involvement.
Subtask 4.2 - Develop Alternatives to Meet Needs
The water plan will include a section on potential solutions for water needs.
Potential alternative solutions for meeting projected water needs will be
identified through public participation and evaluated at a conceptual level.
Detailed analyses of each solution will not be attempted, but concepts will
be identified and evaluated sufficiently for the most promising alternatives.
Some solutions will be non-structural and will include such recommendations
as changes in operating practices, sharing of resources, additional water
rights applications, changes in zoning, development of water ordinances, transfers
of water ownership, and implementation of conservation practices. Structural
recommendations will include implementation of the Animas-La Plata Project,
and may include the Navajo-Gallup pipeline, construction of new diversions
and storage, development of groundwater recharge facilities, treatment facilities,
new wells, pump stations, and conveyance and storage facilities.
Subtask 4.2.1 Evaluation of Aquifer Development Potential
The potential for use of the aquifer for water supply will be evaluated. Literature
will be reviewed to determine potential locations for aquifer development.
Once areas of development are selected for evaluation, based on literature
review, the quantification of the aquifer develpment potential will be determined
and required facilities identified.
Subtask 4.2.2 Other Alternatives Development Tasks
Besides evaluating the above alternatives for storage of water, there will
be other alternatives developed during the public involvement process. These
alternatives will be considered and, with direction from the Technical and
Planning Committees, will be evaluated. Some of the tasks associated with
development of these other alternatives are:
1. Evaluation
of regional municipal storage facilities. A survey of communities will be
used to determine the areas within each watershed that have insufficient treated
water or raw water storage facilities. When possible, regional municipal storage
facilities alternatives will be developed and evaluated.
2. Legal issues
associated with the alternatives will be developed and presented in the plan
as part of the evaluation of alternatives.
3. Flood contingency
- The 100-year FEMA flood maps will be used to evaluate the location of water
facilities. Each water system will be analyzed to determine if water and wastewater
treatment facilities are outside FEMA mapped flood plains. If a water treatment
facility or any permanent structure has the potential of being flooded, additional
studies for flood proofing the facilities will be required. These studies
are outside the scope of the Regional Water Plan and would be completed by
the operators of the facility. This subtask will only identify potential problems
and present them to the facility owners.
4. Drought contingency
- The San Juan River Basin on occasion experiences significant drought conditions.
Lesser drought conditions occur more frequently. Seasonal river flows do not
naturally match the timing of seasonal demands. All of these factors result
in short-term shortages for water user. Those watersheds that will experience
significant shortages will be evaluated for potential drought contingency
plans. Examples of potential elements of a drought contingency plan include:
-Watering
restrictions
-Use
of storage waters
-Groundwater
pumping to meet demands
-Leasing
of agricultural water supplies
-Conservation
audits
This subtask will
result in recommendations for drought contingency plans that would be developed
by the communities. It is outside the scope of this regional plan to develop
community-based drought contingency plans.
5. A significant
source of future water supplies for municipal use is associated with water
used on agricultural lands that are urbanized. City provided maps of anticipated
growth areas will be used to develop an estimate of how future municipal needs
could be met from conversion of agricultural water to municipal uses.
6. Environmental
Alternatives - Potential solutions to environmental concerns related to the
alternatives will be developed. Since environmental considerations are becoming
critical to the success of water projects, these issues will need to be included
in the water plan to adequately address the viability of alternatives.
7. The development
of the proposed Navajo-Gallup pipeline and the planned Navajo-Shiprock (ALP)
will be considered by the regional water plan. This information will be developed
by the Navajo Nation.
8. On-reservation
development needs of the Jicarilla Apache Nation will be provided by the Nation.
9. Conservation
- Chapter VII, Water Conservation, in the 1994 Plan will be updated
to reflect local issues within the SJHU. Conservation measures will include
a listing of potential conservation best management practices (BMP). This
will include an audit of the amount of water produced versus the amount sold,
conservation at public facilities, metering, rates, prohibition of waste,
evaporation and seepage reduction in reservoirs, recycling programs, plumbing
code restrictions relating to residential and commercial usage, landscaping,
and park irrigation. Agriculture conservation measures will be reviewed and
described in the Regional Plan without quantifying conservation volumes. Typically,
changes in irrigation efficiencies are identified as conservation measures,
however this will not significantly change the crop consumptive uses. It will
only change diversion, return flow timing and perhaps water quality. Issues
of changes in crop mixes for conservation are related to the ongoing effort
by the Office of State Engineer to determine consumptive use and is outside
the scope of the regional water plan to direct or recommend these type of
conservation measures.
Future sources of water supply will be investigated. This work will be limited
to evaluation of waters within SJHU. The San Juan River is fully appropriated
and any future sources of water supply will be within rights already permitted
or adjudicated. Groundwater will be limited to those few isolated communities
who currently have an accessible groundwater supply. Groundwater in the region
is generally of low quality and quantity. Without expensive treatment, the
use of groundwater for large public water supply systems is currently impractical.
The social implications (public welfare) of changes from one category of water
use to another will be considered.
Subtask 4.2.3 Deliverables:
-Technical Memorandum of Public Involvement activities. The Technical Memorandum
will include:
1. Documentation
of the Planning Committee and Technical Committee meetings and public meetings,
the public comment database, and any other method to inform the public of
the water planning process.
2. The list of
goals and objectives.
3. The list of
alternatives and alternatives evaluation criteria.
4. The preferred
(recommended) alternatives.
5. The environmental,
legal, economic cost, and political feasibility analysis of the alternatives.
TASK 5 - PREPARE REGIONAL WATER PLAN DRAFT AND FINAL
REPORTS
A comprehensive water plan report, following the State of New Mexico's Regional
Water Planning Handbook template, will be completed and will include supporting
data in the Appendices. It will include maps, table and graphs to describe
the report's findings. The report will be submitted in draft form for review
and for determination and selection of a recommended plan. A review conference
will be held with the Planning Committee to answer questions, to explain the
study findings and alternative solutions, and to facilitate the selection
of a recommended plan.
A public involvement database of all comments received during the public process
will be developed. With the assistance of the Technical Direction Committee
(TDC), consultants and staff will prepare responses to comments and incorporate
comments at the direction of the TDC.
Following review, the draft water plan report will be revised to describe
the recommended plan and incorporate review comments. Thirty copies of the
draft and thirty copies of the final report will be prepared for distribution.
Subtask 5.1.1 Deliverable:
Draft and final Regional Water Plan
TASK 6 - QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE
Quality control and assurance is vital to the success of this project. The
consultant will be required to provide quality control and assurance with
the preparation of a project management plan and documented reviews by senior
level staff to ensure the products developed meeting the highest standard.
In addition, the Commission and its consultant(s) will attend four ISC-OSE
progress meetings. These meetings will be held quarterly. Agendas for the
meetings will be prepared. Quarterly progress reports and deliverables will
be presented.
TASK 7 - ADMINISTRATION
Project administration and budget control include monthly preparation of invoices
and monthly reporting of project progress as it relates to the budget.
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING PROCESS
The proposed planning process was presented as a flow chart on Figure 2. An
important element includes public involvement by the Technical Committee,
the Planning Committee, stakeholders and the public. The key technical elements
include:
-Data collection and evaluation
-Population projections
-Demand estimates and future demand projections
-Supplies determination
-Needs analyses
-Alternatives development and evaluation
Following are questions and responses about the planning process that will
describe it in more detail.
1. How will the regional plan approach the technical evaluation of the
regional water supply?
Since the SJHU is primarily a surface water dependent region, all water allocated
to the State of New Mexico not stored or used is lost when it leaves our region
to downstream states. Approximately 727,000 acre-feet of depletions, of which
it is estimated only 445,000 acre-feet is in use, is at stake. Water not in
use at this time will need to be available as demand increases. The regional
water planning process will identify future water needs and will secure the
resources necessary for the region to address growth while maintaining its
quality of life. Planning will allow a more accurate estimate of current and
projected uses. The technical evaluation of the supply will be directed by
the Technical Committee and will be based on developed supply criteria.
2. What will be the sources of data?
Since the principal supplies associated with the region are from surface water,
the sources of data will be steam gage data. Groundwater data will be obtained
from the 1994 Plan and from groundwater publications identified in its bibliography.
In addition, a search of the NWRI library will be conducted. Finally, the
Navajo Nation and Jicarilla Apache Nation have collected data on their respective
supplies and demands that will be used in the Plan.
3. How will the data's adequacy be determined?
Stream gage data from USGS is by definition the best available data. Groundwater
information obtained from literature research will be reviewed and compared
between authors. This information will all be presented to the Technical Committee
for consideration.
4. What hydrologic components does the region share with other adjacent
regions?
The principal surface water sources, the San Juan, Animas and La Plata Rivers
are all shared with Colorado. These sources will be disaggregated using the
Upper Colorado River Commissions hydrologic determination and its accompanying
depletion schedules as its basis. The Rio Grande Underground Water Basin is
shared with the Upper Rio Grande basin but is a minor source and is far from
major demand areas.
5. Are there water quality problems? How will they be addressed?
Water quality information found in Chapter III of the 1994 Plan pertaining
to the San Juan Hydrologic Unit will be utilized. This section will be expanded
to further evaluate and report use designations imposed by the NM Water Quality
Control Commission and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The material regarding
water quality issues presented by the SJWC to the NM Water Quality Control
Commission will be made available to the Planning Committee. The US Bureau
of Reclamation and the US Fish & Wildlife Service have collected water
quality data for the Animas- La Plata Project and the Recovery Implementation
Plan, and this data is also available. The Planning Committee will use this
material to analyze the use designations and the effect they could have on
types of treatment, diversions and return flows by public water supply systems.
The Committee will assess the significance that these use designations could
have on potential water plan alternative's and include their analysis in this
section's update.
Information reported by the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority or the Public
Health Service on wells within the Navajo Reservation will be included in
the Regional Water Plan update.
The quality of the groundwater in much of the SJHU is not of sufficient quality
for potable use without expensive treatment. In those watersheds where groundwater
is the only significant water source, the water plan will identify viable
treatment options.
6. How does the region plan to inventory current and historical water use?
Current water use (within the past 10 years) of many of the principal water
uses has been inventoried by previous study conducted by the San Juan Water
Commission and the Navajo Nation. There is very limited data on other historical
uses, such as irrigation diversions. Therefore, it is proposed that historical
uses not be determined for this regional water plan. Existing uses not available
from direct measurement will be based on State of New Mexico estimates and
GIS land use information.
7. How will the plan deal with specific legal issues relevant to water
supply and demand?
Chapter VIII, Legal Issues of the 1994 Plan will be updated to incorporate
recent activity. Those portions of Chapter VIII pertaining to the SJHU, will
be used in full in the updated Regional Water Plan presented to the ISC. This
section covers generally subjects addressed in the Template.
The legal issues will be expanded to include Native American concerns prepared
by Tribal representatives and concerns by other stakeholders not reflected
in the 1994 Plan.
8. How does the region plan to inventory population, demographics, and
trends in basic economic section to project water demands?
Task 3 of the above scope of work describes in detail the proposed work
effort. Essentially, a comparison of several sources of population projection
will be made and an economic model will be developed.
Water availability will determine the growth of the San Juan Basin. Economic
growth with and without water development will be analyzed. The model will
be benchmarked to define the economic implications of not having water available.
9. How does the region propose to address environmental issues in the planning
process?
The Planning Committee that is created from the regional planning public participation
will evaluate the recommended alternatives with respect to local values, based
on the Planning Committee's criteria, and present them to the public for their
comments and concerns. After the public has commented on the alternatives,
and any additional study of the alternatives has been completed, the Planning
Committee will identify the alternatives best suited to the Region to assure
quality of life.
The Planning Committee, with assistance from the environmental consultant,
will develop a summary of environmental issues to be addressed by the regional
water plan. This summary will follow through the planning process to evaluation
of alternatives. During evaluation of alternatives, environmental issues associated
with the recommended alternatives will be developed and included in the selection
criteria. Mitigation measure may be identified at this point in the planning
process.
10. What is the region's approach to develop and evaluate alternatives
to provide projected future demands from available supplies?
Alternatives will be initially developed by the Technical Committee and evaluated
by the consultants. This information will be presented to the Planning Committee,
who will have the opportunity to develop additional alternatives. These alternatives
will be presented at the public meeting, during which the public will have
the opportunity to contribute other alternatives for consideration. One-on-one
discussions with stakeholders by the public involvement staff will be conducted,
as appropriate, to receive input and inform stakeholders of the issues and
results of the study.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REGIONAL WATER PLAN
Some of the Regional Water Plan's recommendations will likely be specific
to communities or groups of communities within a watershed. Others may be
general recommendations for all the water users. Therefore, implementation
will become the responsibility of the entity or entities associated with a
recommendation.
By including a broad public participation program with advisory committees,
the potential that implementation will occur is improved. The greater the
involvement of the participating entities, the greater the ownership of alternatives
by those entities.
KEY PERSONNEL
As the sponsoring entity, the San Juan Water Commission will provide its staff
to administer the Regional Water Plan. Following is a list of individuals
and contractors that have agreed to work on this project
San Juan Water Commission
Staff:
-Randy Kirkpatrick
- Executive Director
-Shaun Bishop
- Planning Administrator
-Aaron Chavez
- GIS Database Coordinator
Navajo Nation Representatives:
-John Leeper -
Water Resources Management - DNR
-Michael Benson
- Public Information Officer, Water Resource Mgmnt, DNR
-Dorothy Smith
- Accounting Manager, Financial Services Department
Jicarilla
Apache Nation Representatives:
-Mike A. Hamman
- Tribal Water Administrator
-Kurt Sandoval
- Chaiman, Water Commission
-Stacey Sanchez
- Public Affairs Officer
Contractors:
-Parsons Engineering
Science - Ken Needham, Rick Cox, Kevin Needham
-Taylor &
Murray, P.C. - Legal Services - Elizabeth Taylor
-SWCA Environmental
Consultants, Inc. - Bill Leibfried
-Water Consult
- Tom Pitts
The contractor's have previously worked on the regional water
plan under contract with the SJWC and continue to collect information for
this project at SJWC direction. These contractors were selected through a
competitive selection process approved by the SJWC. Resumes of the contractors
are included in Attachment 3.
Assistance from ISC Staff
One water workshop is proposed for this regional water plan. The Planning
Committee will determine with its Public Involvement Strategy (Task 4) what
the workshop should include. It will make the request to ISC for assistance
with the workshop.
POLITICAL FRAMEWORK AMONG MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
IN THE REGION
In the 1994 regional water planning proposal, the SJWC committed to transfer,
through a separate agreement, a portion of the ISC grant funds to the Water
Management Branch, Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources Management,
to perform certain tasks within the Navajo Nation water planning area in the
San Juan Basin of New Mexico. The SJWC and the Navajo Nation Water Resources
Management Department, Division of Natural Resources entered into the "Agreement
for Regional Water Planning", Contract # C60435 on May 1, 1996 and the
proposed work was accomplished. This "Agreement" (Contract # C60435)
ended September 30, 1996. The limited funding granted to the SJWC by the ISC
would allow only part of the planning work described in the 1994 SJWC proposal
to be performed, with the balance of the work needed subject to the future
availability of other funds. The Navajo Nation has continued to demonstrate
their desire to be active partners with the SJWC in the regional water planning
process and at a September 14, 1998 meeting, they agreed to supply the information
on water supply and uses that had been developed for the Navajo Nation. The
"Agreement" (Contract #C60435) will be for the development and implementation
of those tasks as described in the "Scope of Work" that need to
be performed within the SJHU within New Mexico that includes lands within
the recognized boundary of the Navajo Nation.
Information received from the Navajo Nation and other Tribes, as well as the
data collected from non-Indian sources will be assembled by the consultant.
From this body of reports and recommendations, the Planning Committee will
have the legal implications summarized and choose the alternatives that merit
presentation to the public. Comments and concerns from the public regarding
the alternatives will serve to guide the Planning Committee as they select
those alternatives that warrant further discussion and professional study.
Interested groups and the public will be able to directly communicate their
comments and concerns to the Planning Committee through the representative
serving their group or area of interest.
Simultaneously the Planning Committee will review water supply and demand
issues that impact neighboring regions. Water resource assessments will be
reported on and updated. This will provide the Planning Committee additional
information as to the impact the alternatives might have on neighboring regions.
The Committee will propose a series of meetings with the affected region(s)
planning committee to articulate concerns and to design a format where issues
and their alternatives could be discussed and acted on. This format would
allow the affected entities to produce reasonably accepted solutions, which
would be included in the San Juan Hydrologic Unit's final regional plan to
be considered for inclusion in the State Water Plan.
BUDGET
The following budget includes the work identified in the scope of work and
schedule above. It does not include the early data collection and planning
efforts (Phase I).
The budget presented in Figure 3 and supporting information in Attachment
2 reflects the SJWC's estimate of costs required to complete the San Juan
Hydrologic Unit Regional Water Plan. In-kind contributions from the Navajo
Nation and the SJWC are included in the budget. The following table summarizes
the costs of the participating entities.
|
Entity
|
Project Budget (Labor only)
|
| San Juan Water Commission |
$58,620
|
| Navajo Nation |
$14,880
|
| Jicarrilla Apache Nation |
$1,500
|
| Engineering Consultant |
$157,960
|
| Legal Consultant |
$9,775
|
| Environmental Consultant |
$3,200.00
|
San Juan County, as fiscal agent for the San Juan Water Commission,
will disburse funds as the deliverable milestone documents are received. Once
established, the Planning Committee will have the responsibility of contracting
and coordinating the resources necessary for completing the scheduled work.
The Planning Committee will follow an established procedure to ensure invoice
accuracy and completeness of work before sending invoices to the SJWC for
processing. The SJWC as Plan Administrator, will review and approve all documents
before grant funds are distributed. A record of all expenses and disbursements
will be kept by the SJWC, Plan Administrator.
SUMMARY STATEMENT
The completion of a San Juan Regional Water Plan is important to the future
of the region. The SJWC, the Navajo Nation and, more recently, the Jicarilla
Apache Nation have committed significant resources to its accomplishment and
request that the ISC support this effort with the requested funding.
The plan to plan presented by this scope of work is a sound process for arriving
at the desired goal of the project. Establishing the Planning and Technical
Committees to guide the study will ensure that the final plan receives broad
public support.
The schedule is tight but can be accomplished because much of the foundation
for the work, including data collection, has been completed.